Beretta 90-TWO vs Norinco NZ75

Put handguns head to head to compare caliber and more.

Featured Deal
$409.85
vs
Featured Deal
$0.00
Handguns Beretta 90-TWO Norinco NZ75
Summary
Rating
Firearms Review Rating Not Rated
Firearms Review Rating Not Rated
Rank
#21316
#43656
Action Double Action
Caliber 9x19mm Parabellum
Capacity 17+1 17+1
Sights Night Sights Front Blade
Barrel Length 4.9" 4.52"
Finish Black Stainless Steel
Gun Type Pistol Pistol
Weight 39.5 oz
Details
Brand Beretta
Reviews See 20 Reviews N/A
Prices
MSRP $413.85 $0.00
Used Price $289.70 $0.00
Sale Price $372.47 $0.00

Handguns Descriptions

Beretta 90-TWO

The newly designed frame of 90two pistol ensures trouble-free insertion and holster extraction, thanks to its rounded and truly snag-free surfaces. Inside the frame, near the disassembly lever, a metallic recoil buffer reduces the impact of the slide assembly against the frame during the shooting cycle. By redistributing the stresses, the recoil buffer increases the service life of the firearm. Trigger guard is also rounded to ensure, when firing with two hands, the correct positioning of the supporting hand.

Norinco NZ75

The Norinco NZ75 is Chinese clone of CZ-75 pistol. Developed by the Koucky brothers at Ceska Zbrojovka in 1975, the CZ-75 pistol after which the NZ-75 is patterned is a double action short recoil handgun renowned for its reliable action, comfortable grip, well-placed controls, and accuracy. It is also one of the first high capacity double action 9x19mm handguns that replaced old .38 special service revolver as the primary sidearm of law enforcement officers throughout the world. Norinco's NZ-75 is an excellent choice for novice and expert alike. It features forged (not cast) steel construction, chrome-lined barrel, and a safety catch which doubles as a decocking lever. Like CZ-75 pistol, the NZ-75's slide rails are on the inside rather than the outside of the frame, a system said to increase accuracy and smooth operation. Importing of Norinco firearms in the US was banned in conjunction with 1993 and 2003 U.S. trade sanctions

Suggested Comparisons